Making narrative structure visible, verifiable, and navigable.
Narrative Commons extracts, structures, and presents competing frameworks from a thousand incoherent voices — with transparent sourcing, rigorous attribution, and honest uncertainty.
Investigations
Each analysis is a structured traversal of one or more narrative frameworks. Sources are extracted, claims are attributed, confidence is rated, and predictions are tracked. Click to explore.
The Hijacking of Bitcoin
From peer-to-peer digital cash to backdoor CBDC
Follow the money from Jeffrey Epstein through the Bitcoin Foundation, Blockstream, Tether, and the GENIUS Act. An interactive investigation into the network that captured Bitcoin’s development and transformed it into surveillance-ready financial infrastructure.
Predictive History
Power as Imagination • Game Theory • Eschatology
A comprehensive analysis of Professor Jang’s framework for civilizational prediction — integrating historical pattern recognition, game-theoretic elite analysis, and religious eschatology as operational code. Verified with Runcible at 63/100 confidence.
How We Work
Every analysis follows the same pipeline. The method is transparent, improvable, and designed to compound over time.
Extract
Identify sources. Transcribe primary material (video, audio, text). Build a corpus. Every claim traces back to a specific source, timestamp, and context.
Structure
Extract atomic claims. Classify them (descriptive, causal, predictive, normative). Map relationships between claims, figures, and frameworks. Build the graph.
Verify
Rate confidence across four dimensions: centrality to the source, extraction confidence, verification state, and prediction resolution. Use Runcible for computational verification where possible.
Present
Publish as interactive, navigable pages. Every assertion is attributed. Uncertainty is shown, not hidden. Visualizations make structure legible. The reader can follow every thread to its source.
What This Is
Narrative Commons is public infrastructure for understanding the narratives that shape civilization. In a world saturated with competing frameworks — geopolitical, religious, conspiratorial, mainstream, dissident — most people lack the tools to systematically evaluate any of them.
We provide that mechanism. Not by telling you which narrative is correct, but by making their structure visible: what they claim, what they predict, where they overlap, and where they contradict. We extract claims from primary sources, rate our confidence in each extraction, and present them in formats that let you follow every thread to its origin.
The method is constitutional: governed by explicit rules about what can be published, how confidence is assessed, and what rights sources and subjects retain. The tooling is improving — each analysis makes the next one faster and more rigorous. This is version one. It will get better.